Thursday, 27 April 2017

CASE 9

CASE: Child refugees in Turkey making clothes for UK shops

There are three main challenges that managers have to face in today’s organizations, and it’s important to deal with them effectively in order for the company to stay competitive. These challenges can be classified as environmental challenges, organizational challenges and individual challenges.
  • Environmental challenges: External forces influencing organizational performance, beyond management’s control. These forces include the constant rapid change of the business environment, the internet revolution transforming how firms manage their human resources dealing with information overflow and online learning, workforce diversity where there’s an increasing number of women and minorities, globalization that results in competition against foreign firms, legislation, evolving work and family roles where companies are introducing “family-friendly” programs especially concerning dual-career families, skill shortages and the rise of the service sector, and natural disasters and terrorism resulting in managers dealing with new and urgent HR issues.
  • Organizational challenges: A company’s internal concerns and problems, often affected by environmental forces. Here proactivity is key for managers to find the organizational issues and deal with them before they become critical. Different HR practices can help with that, including decentralization which transfers responsibility to more relevant locations, downsizing to improve the company’s bottom line, organizational restructuring, implementing more self-managed work teams, adjusting the organizational culture to keep up with the environmental changes, utilizing information technologyinternal security and data security, saving costs by outsourcing, and monitoring the company’s product integrity.
  • Individual challenges: HR issues dealing with the decisions that are most relevant and important to individual workers. Individual challenges and organizational challenges have an affect on each other, and can both be addressed by using effective HR practices to manage the company and its workforce. These challenges include matching people and organizations, implementing ethics and social responsibility as an important ground factor for the workforce, the difficulties of maximizing productivityability and motivation in the workforce, offering a high quality of work life, finding ways to empower employees, the liability of brain drain, and job insecurity as a result of layoffs.(Gómez-Mejía, Balkin & Cardy 2016, 31-48.)
Strategic human resource (HR) planning captures the process of designing HR strategies and installing programs or tactics to implement them.
  • There are many benefits of strategic HR planning: Encouragement of proactive rather than reactive behaviorexplicit communication of company goals when they develop strategic objectives that exploits on the firm’s special talents, stimulation of critical thinking and ongoing examination of assumptions during a flexible process, identification of gaps between current situation and future visionencouragement of line manager’s participation, identification of HR constraints and opportunities when overall business strategy planning is done together with HR strategic planning, and creation of common bonds as a result of a strategic HR plan that reinforces, adjusts, or directs the organization’s present culture in order to foster customer focus, innovation, fast growth and cooperation.

  • There are also many crucial challenges that a company faces when developing an effective HR strategy: Maintaining a competitive advantage by establishing programs to expand present employees’ potential through carefully developed career ladders, reinforcing overall business strategyavoiding excessive concentration on day-to-day problems and focusing instead on the long term goals, developing HR strategies suited to unique organizational features in firms that operate with different culture, leadership style and technology, coping with the environment within companies that deal with different industry environments, securing management commitment at all levels to support the HR strategies, translating the strategic plan into action that will affect practice, combining intended and emergent strategies to recognize environmental opportunities and threats, and accommodating change with a flexible HR strategy.
    (Gómez-Mejía et al., 2016, 49-52.)
Strategic HR choices are the options available in a company when designing its human resources system. Some common strategic HR choices are:
  • Work flows
  • Staffing
  • Employee separations
  • Performance appraisal
  • Training and career development
  • Compensation
  • Employee and labor relations
  • Employee rights
  • International management
    (Gómez-Mejía et al., 2016, 52-55.)


Case summary:

Syrian refugee children have been making clothes for British shoppers, an undercover BBC investigation has found.

Panorama investigated factories in Turkey and found children had been working on clothes for Marks and Spencer and the online retailer Asos.
Adult refugees were also found working illegally on Zara and Mango jeans.
All the brands say they carefully monitor their supply chains and do not tolerate the exploitation of refugees or children.
In this case presented the challenge an organization can face when it comes to ethics and social resposibility.


Sources: Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin, D.B. and Cardy, R.L. 2016. Managing Human Resources. Global Edition 8/E. Pearson. London.

Thursday, 20 April 2017

CASE8

CASE 8: EXIT MANAGEMENT

What are employee seperations?

 An employee separation occurs when an employee ceases to be a member of an organization.7 The turnover rate is a measure of the rate at which employees leave the firm. Well-managed companies try to monitor their turnover rate and identify and manage causes for turnover. The goal is to minimize turnover and the costs of replacing employees.


Case A:Nokia closes plant in Germany and relocates in Romania


Without the slightest information or consultation, the Finnish management of the world-leading mobile phone producer Nokia announced the abolition of 4,000 jobs. The ETUC decided to revise the EU directive on European Works Councils (EWCs).


In particular, it must be guaranteed that companies cannot ride roughshod over European and national workers’ rights without sanctions. In any case it must be guaranteed that no layoffs or transfers can be carried out without prior thorough information and serious consultations with the workers’ representatives and their trade unions. 

 
The EU Commission can thereby make a meaningful sign that it is not only concerned for a better business environment but that it also has the power to strengthen worker’s rights across Europe.

Case B: Nokia cuts 3500 jobs "to ensure profitability

Nokia informed employees of new, drastic job cuts on Thursday. A total of 3,500 jobs are to go. The plant in Cluj, Romania, which is just four years old, is to be closed by the end of this year. Meanwhile the fates of those in Hungary, Mexico and Salo, Finland hang in the balance.


The company's Executive Vice President of Markets, Niklas Savander, says the job cuts are intended to ensure the company remains profitable both now and in the future.
”It is impractical to manufacture products in Europe when one has fly all the components to Europe and then fly the readymade phones back to Asia,” he stated.
Savander confirmed the company planned to end the assembly of phones at the Salo plant and transfer operations to Asia.

Case C: Hundreds of Nokia's outsourced Symbian developers leaving Accenture



“Around 40 percent of those who were transferred have sought [the pay-offs],” said shop steward Sami Sallmén. “A majority of them have signed leaving agreements. That’s based on the survey we commissioned.”

 Sallmén says that there is now so little work that some Accenture employees are left twiddling their thumbs. The severance packages have been an agreeable offer for many outsourced developers.


Unions had criticised the outsourcing arrangement from the start. They had feared that Symbian developers—working on an operating system that was to be replaced by Windows Phone as the main smartphone platform for Nokia—would face a short career with their new employers.

Accenture management are keeping a low profile on the story. The company’s communications department explained by email that the lay-off programme is voluntary. It says that the packages have been offered to those former Nokia employees that have not yet found new responsibilities within Accenture. The company would not confirm how many former Symbian developers had left.


Source: Nokia C Nokia B Nokia A  
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin, D.B. and Cardy, R.L. 2016. Managing Human Resources. Global Edition 8/E. Pearson. London. ISBN-10: 1292097248



Thursday, 6 April 2017

CASE7

Employee Engagement

What is employee engagement

  • Employee engagement is not employee satisfaction or happiness.
  • Employee engagement is the emotional commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals.
  • When employees care—when they are engaged—they use discretionary effort.

What happens when the employees are engaged?
  • According to Towers Perrin research companies with engaged workers have 6% higher net profit margins, and according to Kenexa research engaged companies have five times higher shareholder returns over five years.
  • Engaged Employees lead to
       higher service, quality, and productivity, which leads to…
          higher customer satisfaction, which leads to…
             increased sales (repeat business and referrals), which leads to…
                higher levels of profit, which leads to…
                   higher shareholder returns (i.e., stock price)
"To win in the marketplace you must first win in the workplace."former Campbell's Soup CEO, Doug Conant

What has to happen to make engagement work?

  • The most important enabler: the employees believed that their senior management had a sincere interest in their well-being. 
  • The second driver was the extent to which employees believed that they had improved their skills and capabilities over the previous year.
  • Leadership



Example: